whilst Brit government is still injecting huge amounts of money in to the economy to counter the Covid-19 crisis, there is certainly already serious explore how to pay for it.

Inevitably, taxation is from the schedule. Most of the potential choices including possible increases in income tax, national insurance coverage and VAT have their critics. But few raise as many hackles as any suggestion of quite a lot tax.

As soon as the FT recently organised a Q&A for visitors with this precise point, I expected it to trigger powerful feelings. Nevertheless the reaction had been nonetheless astonishing: there have been above 300 commentary on the question How would a wealth taxation work? That's the highest quantity gotten on any one of FTs Live interactive Q&A sessions previously.

Given that FT expert answering readers, I could just reply to a fraction of comments throughout the allotted hour. But since that time Ive already been mulling over everything we can study on the conversation.

very first, to put it moderately, many FT readers aren't in preference of quite a lot income tax. This might be as opposed to a recent poll by YouGov which surveyed 1,682 UK grownups and found 61 % would accept of an abundance income tax for all those with assets of greater than 750,000.

in a single good sense this is not surprising. Most FT visitors are somewhat wealthier than the normal UK adult. Or, together audience sardonically put it: Most of those who said that they support [a wealth taxation] wouldnt be people who would-be having to pay it themselves. Always easy to use other individuals cash.

performs this imply the powerful anti-wealth income tax feeling, indicated into the remarks, comes down to a self-interested want to avoid spending more income tax? Positively. However, even though this motivation ended up being expressed, it had been often associated with various other views.

tax, NIC [national insurance coverage contributions], VAT, fuel task, beer task, stamp responsibility, CGT [capital gains tax], the list continues. Many of these taxes are paid; what makes you so thinking about giving out a lot more of money towards the UNITED KINGDOM coffers for having to pay 200K to civil servants for managing offer stores that cant get PPE from a warehouse to a hospital, requested one audience.

some commentators said they believed both individuals and governing bodies had a responsibility to save lots of for a rainy day and therefore quite a lot taxation would penalise those who had saved to produce conditions money for hard times. They are those that have their resides sorted away and who aren't a burden in the public bag, one individual told me.

a considerable minority disagreed. They argued that wide range was not constantly developed or received through work and cost savings, but sometimes by inheritance or untaxed gains.

cash that produces assets have not fundamentally already been taxed as income after all, rather the contrary, one audience stated. Many wealth within the Southeast is mainly because boomers bought home 20-30 years ago and have done nothing of economic value to generate that wealthy asset.

those who find themselves the poorest disproportionately are taxed the highest percentage of the wide range, someone else typed. Those who find themselves the wealthiest, during absolute numbers are adding much more, the portion of these wide range going to the federal government is much smaller. Therefore, the influence that taxation has on the affluent is significantly less besides. This really is neither reasonable nor lasting.

These visitors generally speaking state they'd be happy to spend even more either as an abundance tax or through increased rates on money gains or inheritance taxation. Some view it as a moral argument . Taxation is also a function of a moral culture, such that those who are better off provide a safety internet for those of you fallen on hard times, stated one.

This political clash between those that believe in a small state with minimal functions and taxes and the ones just who trust an interventionist declare that provides an extensive safety net, accounts for a lot of the heat in talks around wide range fees.

One commentator hit the nail from the mind once they wrote: there is certainly an enormous cultural question to handle. The united kingdom is one of economical[ly] right-wing country in Europe. We're not likely in order to become France.

These cultural or financial values could clarify why the notion of a wealth taxation hasn't got much grip inside UK, although it is gathered in four europe - Norway, Spain, Belgium and Switzerland.

however in Britain a feeling that values might be changing in favour of greater taxes accounts for much of the palpable anxiety contained within the comments voiced in FT Q&A. Faced with a Conservative government that has enacted the greatest peacetime programme of financial help and overseen a huge expansion of public debt, wealthy individuals are uncertain just what meaning money for hard times for the nation and their assets.

Readers also said the pandemic had brought into focus the festering economic inequality involving the younger plus the old an issue that will no more be brushed aside.

It is protect asset-rich, already-retired seniors that asset-poor younger individuals have needed to endure a massive downturn. Quite a lot taxation on those owning expensive properties would be a great way to redress this balance, said one reader.

a relevant motif when you look at the comments asked exactly how an abundance tax could be relatively built to limit evasion while also taking account of these whom hold important assets but have little money. France abolished its wealth levy in 2017 partially given that it produced small income.

These are merely some of the conditions that would need to be ironed completely before any such tax was introduced. Its not likely that ministers will however be attracting up plans because of this as they grapple with the everyday demands of an economic and health crisis. But there is an ever growing consensus among politicians, economists and taxation professionals along with FT readers your lasting odds of the affluent being requested to pay more have dramatically narrowed.

the writer is FT Moneys tax reporter. Twitter: