BoE stress tests: all you need to know

The Bank of England has released the results of its latest round of its annual banking stress tests and its semi-annual financial stability report this morning. Used to measure the resilience of a bank’s balance sheet in adverse scenarios, the stress tests measured the impact of a severe slowdown in Chinese growth, a global recession […]

Continue Reading


Draghi: Eurozone will decline without vital productivity growth

It’s productivity, stupid. European Central Bank president Mario Draghi has become the latest major policymaker to warn of the long-term economic damage posed by chronically low productivity growth, as he urged eurozone governments to take action to lift growth and stoke innovation. Speaking in Madrid on Wednesday, Mr Draghi noted that productivity rises in the […]

Continue Reading


Asia markets tentative ahead of Opec meeting

Wednesday 2.30am GMT Overview Markets across Asia were treading cautiously on Wednesday, following mild overnight gains for Wall Street, a weakening of the US dollar and as investors turned their attention to a meeting between Opec members later today. What to watch Oil prices are in focus ahead of Wednesday’s Opec meeting in Vienna. The […]

Continue Reading

Banks, Financial

RBS emerges as biggest failure in tough UK bank stress tests

Royal Bank of Scotland has emerged as the biggest failure in the UK’s annual stress tests, forcing the state-controlled lender to present regulators with a new plan to bolster its capital position by at least £2bn. Barclays and Standard Chartered also failed to meet some of their minimum hurdles in the toughest stress scenario ever […]

Continue Reading


Barclays: life in the old dog yet

Barclays, a former basket case of British banking, is beginning to look inspiringly mediocre. The bank has failed Bank of England stress tests less resoundingly than Royal Bank of Scotland. Investors believe its assets are worth only 10 per cent less than their book value, judging from the share price. Although Barclays’s legal team have […]

Continue Reading

Categorized | Banks

Fed eyes rise in banks’ commodities capital

Posted on September 23, 2016

GULF OF MEXICO - APRIL 21: In this handout image provided be the U.S. Coast Guard, fire boat response crews battle the blazing remnants of the off shore oil rig Deepwater Horizon in the Gulf of Mexico on April 21, 2010 near New Orleans, Louisiana. An estimated leak of 1,000 barrels of oil a day are still leaking into the gulf. Multiple Coast Guard helicopters, planes and cutters responded to rescue the Deepwater Horizon's 126 person crew. (Photo by U.S. Coast Guard via Getty Images)©Getty

Banks will have to carry billions of dollars in extra capital if they trade hazardous materials such as oil and natural gas under a proposed US regulation meant to lessen the risks of liability from spills, explosions and other catastrophes.

The Federal Reserve on Friday released a proposed rule governing Wall Street’s involvement in physical commodities that would stiffen capital requirements, tighten limits on trading activity, remove banks from the business of running power plants and restrict their activities in the copper market. Banks that stay in the market despite the restrictions would have to reveal their commodities holdings to the public.

    The proposal comes after years of deliberation during which many of the largest banks on Wall Street retreated from the business of handling raw materials. Pressure from the Fed and the collapse of global commodity markets hastened their exit.

    The bank likely to be hardest hit would be Goldman Sachs, which has stood by its vast commodities franchise, known as J Aron, delivering oil to refineries and natural gas to utilities.

    Fed staff said the proposal, now open for public comment, would “better address the potential legal, reputational, and financial risks posed by such activities, particularly those that can result from an environmental catastrophe”.

    Since 2003, the Fed has given 12 banks authority to wade into the physical commodities trading business, a province traditionally dominated by commercial producers and merchants such as BP, Cargill or Vitol. But US lawmakers have raised questions about the risks these businesses present to banks and the financial system.

    Under the Fed’s proposal, banks using this authority would have to assign a risk weight of 300 per cent to their physical commodity holdings. For example, a tank holding $1m of petrol would have a risk weight of $3m. Based on a 10 per cent capital requirement, this would require an additional $300,000 of capital.

    Two banks, Goldman and Morgan Stanley, were “grandfathered” under a 1999 law to be allowed to own pieces of commodities infrastructure such as power plants and oil terminals, in addition to the materials that pass through them.

    Any commodities or assets held under this exemption would have what Fed officials called a punitive 1,250 per cent risk weight, requiring capital equal to the value of the underlying commodity or asset.

    While Goldman continues to trade physical commodities, it has sold infrastructure such as coal mines and power plants. Morgan Stanley has also largely disposed of its physical commodities assets after selling off fuel distributor TransMontaigne and its global oil merchant business.

    In aggregate, the 14 banks affected by the rule could face up to $4bn in additional capital requirements, Fed officials said. The proposal comes two weeks after the Fed urged Congress to repeal the law giving Goldman and Morgan Stanley their exemption.