Nomura rounds up markets’ biggest misses in 2016

Forecasting markets a year in advance is never easy, but with “year-ahead investment themes” season well underway, Nomura has provided a handy reminder of quite how difficult it is, with an overview of markets’ biggest hits and misses (OK, mostly misses) from the start of 2016. The biggest miss among analysts, according to Nomura’s Sam […]

Continue Reading


Spanish construction rebuilds after market collapse

Property developer Olivier Crambade founded Therus Invest in Madrid in 2004 to build offices and retail space. For five years business went quite well, and Therus developed and sold more than €300m of properties. Then Spain’s economy imploded, taking property with it, and Mr Crambade spent six years tending to Dhamma Energy, a solar energy […]

Continue Reading


Euro suffers worst month against the pound since financial crisis

Political risks are still all the rage in the currency markets. The euro has suffered its worst slump against the pound since 2009 in November, as investors hone in on a series of looming battles between eurosceptic populists and establishment parties at the ballot box. The single currency has shed 4.5 per cent against sterling […]

Continue Reading


RBS falls 2% after failing BoE stress test

Royal Bank of Scotland shares have slipped 2 per cent in early trading this morning, after the state-controlled lender emerged as the biggest loser in the Bank of England’s latest round of annual stress tests. The lender has now given regulators a plan to bulk up its capital levels by cutting costs and selling assets, […]

Continue Reading


China capital curbs reflect buyer’s remorse over market reforms

Last year the reformist head of China’s central bank convinced his Communist party bosses to give market forces a bigger say in setting the renminbi’s daily “reference rate” against the US dollar. In return, Zhou Xiaochuan assured his more conservative party colleagues that the redback would finally secure coveted recognition as an official reserve currency […]

Continue Reading

Categorized | Capital Markets

BoJ move risks worst of all worlds

Posted on September 21, 2016

A Japanese national flag is hoisted at Bank of Japan headquarters in Tokyo...A Japanese national flag is hoisted at Bank of Japan headquarters in Tokyo February 25, 2013. Japan's prime minister is likely to nominate an advocate of aggressive monetary easing - Asian Development Bank President Haruhiko Kuroda - as the next central bank governor to step up his fight to finally rid the country of deflation. REUTERS/Yuya Shino (JAPAN - Tags: BUSINESS POLITICS) pworld©Reuters

In the years after the 2008 financial crisis, as the US Federal Reserve battled to bring down unemployment, Ben Bernanke, its then chairman, was often urged to consider a couple of radical ideas.

One was that the Fed should promise to overshoot its 2 per cent inflation target. Another was that it should effectively make its bond purchases unlimited, putting caps on yields and promising to buy all bonds offered at that price.

    Mr Bernanke was not convinced by either proposal but now Haruhiko Kuroda, governor of the Bank of Japan, has adopted both policies in a single day. JPMorgan chief economist Masaaki Kanno calls it “the biggest regime shift since Kuroda became governor”.

    But the danger is that Mr Kuroda has left his move too late and the BoJ no longer has enough credibility to make promises — leaving him with all the downside from radical policy action but little of the benefit.

    A yield cap could ease policy in theory because, if and when inflation in Japan picks up, the interest rates paid by businesses and homeowners will not follow them upwards.

    “Under the previous strategy of asset purchase targets, a rise in inflation would have been expected to be matched by a firming of JGB yields, keeping real yields broadly stable,” says Simon Ward, chief economist at Henderson Global Investors.

    “The new peg at zero will force real yields lower as inflation picks up — policy, in other words, will become more expansionary as inflation rises towards the target.”

    The problem for the BoJ is a widespread perception that it is targeting yields because it has run out of bonds to buy, and rather than easing, the change is actually an admission that it will be hard for the BoJ to hit its inflation goal.

    “This change in the policy framework shifts the focus from quantitative measures to interest rates,” said Kiichi Murashima at Citi in Tokyo. “One way of interpreting this decision is an effective retreat by the BoJ from a ‘short war’ to achieve its 2 per cent target.”

    Although the BoJ said it would continue to buy government bonds at a pace of about ¥80tn a year, it will no longer buy as much long-term debt, letting yields on those bonds rise so banks can make money. That adds to the perception of a retreat.

    The second part of the policy, pledging to overshoot its 2 per cent goal, also eases policy in theory by encouraging the public to expect higher inflation in the future. If inflation is expected to be high, borrowing at today’s low rates looks a better deal.

    But a promise to overshoot only matters if the public believes it will actually happen, and as Mr Kanno says, the last three-and-a-half years of stuttering efforts to raise inflation mean that “the BoJ’s credibility is down tremendously”.

    “Few people believe that 2 per cent inflation will be achieved any time soon without new tools,” he says, but the commitment to overshoot “will work only if and when people believe 2 per cent inflation is on the horizon”.

    Market reaction suggests investors do not think the BoJ’s promises are credible. After initially weakening by about 1 per cent against the dollar, the yen rallied a few hours later, and by the end of Tokyo trading it was up a little on the day.

    That means Mr Kuroda may get the worst of all worlds: little easing benefit now, but big problems if and when inflation does start to rise, because the yield cap and his pledge to overshoot 2 per cent will make his exit from easy policy — already challenging — even harder to manage.