BoE stress tests: all you need to know

The Bank of England has released the results of its latest round of its annual banking stress tests and its semi-annual financial stability report this morning. Used to measure the resilience of a bank’s balance sheet in adverse scenarios, the stress tests measured the impact of a severe slowdown in Chinese growth, a global recession […]

Continue Reading


Draghi: Eurozone will decline without vital productivity growth

It’s productivity, stupid. European Central Bank president Mario Draghi has become the latest major policymaker to warn of the long-term economic damage posed by chronically low productivity growth, as he urged eurozone governments to take action to lift growth and stoke innovation. Speaking in Madrid on Wednesday, Mr Draghi noted that productivity rises in the […]

Continue Reading


Asia markets tentative ahead of Opec meeting

Wednesday 2.30am GMT Overview Markets across Asia were treading cautiously on Wednesday, following mild overnight gains for Wall Street, a weakening of the US dollar and as investors turned their attention to a meeting between Opec members later today. What to watch Oil prices are in focus ahead of Wednesday’s Opec meeting in Vienna. The […]

Continue Reading

Banks, Financial

RBS emerges as biggest failure in tough UK bank stress tests

Royal Bank of Scotland has emerged as the biggest failure in the UK’s annual stress tests, forcing the state-controlled lender to present regulators with a new plan to bolster its capital position by at least £2bn. Barclays and Standard Chartered also failed to meet some of their minimum hurdles in the toughest stress scenario ever […]

Continue Reading


Barclays: life in the old dog yet

Barclays, a former basket case of British banking, is beginning to look inspiringly mediocre. The bank has failed Bank of England stress tests less resoundingly than Royal Bank of Scotland. Investors believe its assets are worth only 10 per cent less than their book value, judging from the share price. Although Barclays’s legal team have […]

Continue Reading

Categorized | Equities

US banks hit out at new collateral rules

Posted on October 28, 2015


Banks are reeling after rules finalised by US regulators, aimed at reducing the risk of trading esoteric derivatives, are set to increase trading costs and further hit deteriorating fixed income business.

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation will require banks to post and receive collateral to protect against losses on derivatives that are traded bilaterally, as opposed to being centrally cleared.

    Banks will also have to collect collateral on trades done with their own affiliates, but here the burden has been eased a little as the FDIC’s proposed rules required inter-affiliate trades to both collect and post collateral.

    However, this requirement does not go far enough, the industry has said. One large US dealer claimed its cost of funding transactions would double, pushing banks to trade fewer uncleared derivatives, reducing liquidity and increasing costs for clients.

    “The inter affiliate issue is not solved by this,” said a risk manager at the bank. “I am certainly not happy having read this.”

    The new rules come at a time when banks’ fixed income units are under pressure, squeezed by tougher rules on capital and a shift among clients to simpler, less profitable products. Last year’s global FICC revenue pool of $118bn was 46 per cent lower than in 2009, according to data from Coalition, a research group, and is set to dip again this year.

    At Goldman Sachs, a one-third drop in FICC revenues in the third quarter — knocking return on equity down to 7 per cent, the lowest in two years — was the talk of the US banks’ earnings season.

    Large, sprawling banks often trade derivatives between different legal entities to centralise risk, or offset risks within different parts of the bank. The requirement to collect collateral when they trade with affiliates would tie up assets that could otherwise be put to work in the market.

    The FDIC rule applies to banking entities. Eyes will now turn to rules being written by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission that will apply to non-bank affiliates. If the CFTC requires non-bank affiliates to also collect collateral then the combined rules will effectively still require two-way posting.

    “While the requirement to only post one-way rather than two-way with certain affiliates is clearly better than requiring two-way with all affiliates, this rule increases the cost of serving clients and hedging risk while doing nothing to enhance the safety and soundness of the organisation,” said Greg Baer, president of The Clearing House Association, an industry organisation.

    The rules also affect the securitisation industry, where assets such as mortgages or loans are packaged up and sold to investors. Often, derivatives are used in the packages to smooth out the different interest rates of the underlying assets, or to convert fixed rate assets into a variable rate that is more suitable to investors.

    Ellen Pesch, partner at law firm Sidley Austin, warned of the increased cost of securitising assets, making some deals uneconomic. She added that it could also encourage investors to move deals to Europe where the rules are less stringent.

    “I think there are deals getting done on skinny budgets and if you have increased cost because you are posting collateral, then it will inhibit those deals,” she said.