Hard-hit online lender CAN Capital makes executive changes

The biggest online lender to small businesses in the US has pulled down the shutters and put its top managers on a leave of absence, in the latest blow to an industry grappling with mounting fears over credit quality. Atlanta-based CAN Capital said on Tuesday that it had replaced a trio of senior executives, after […]

Continue Reading


BoE stress tests: all you need to know

The Bank of England has released the results of its latest round of its annual banking stress tests and its semi-annual financial stability report this morning. Used to measure the resilience of a bank’s balance sheet in adverse scenarios, the stress tests measured the impact of a severe slowdown in Chinese growth, a global recession […]

Continue Reading


Zoopla wins back customers from online property rival

Zoopla chief executive Alex Chesterman has branded rival OnTheMarket “a failed experiment”, and said that his property site was winning back customers at a record rate. OnTheMarket was set up last year, aiming to compete with Zoopla and Rightmove, the UK’s two biggest property portals. It allowed estate agents to list their properties more cheaply […]

Continue Reading


Asia markets tentative ahead of Opec meeting

Wednesday 2.30am GMT Overview Markets across Asia were treading cautiously on Wednesday, following mild overnight gains for Wall Street, a weakening of the US dollar and as investors turned their attention to a meeting between Opec members later today. What to watch Oil prices are in focus ahead of Wednesday’s Opec meeting in Vienna. The […]

Continue Reading

Banks, Financial

RBS emerges as biggest failure in tough UK bank stress tests

Royal Bank of Scotland has emerged as the biggest failure in the UK’s annual stress tests, forcing the state-controlled lender to present regulators with a new plan to bolster its capital position by at least £2bn. Barclays and Standard Chartered also failed to meet some of their minimum hurdles in the toughest stress scenario ever […]

Continue Reading

Categorized | Financial

Mercia investors warm to start-up push

Posted on May 31, 2015

If only investors had it that easy: gaining some exposure to the next hot start-up without the risk that it might fail.

Several University spinout groups such as Imperial Innovations and IP Group have had mixed fortunes as investors took fright after the 2008 financial crisis.

    Now, Mercia Technologies, which listed on Aim in December last year, has come up with possible solution: a hybrid that identifies promising, young businesses, but keeps funding the best performing ones for up to 20 years.

    The specialist investor aims to have sufficient spread that some businesses will be paying out dividends while it invests in other, younger ones. And while it has relationships with nine universities, mainly in the Midlands where it is based, it also looks elsewhere for opportunities.

    “About half our investments are university spinouts. We want to build digital businesses. They don’t tend to come from universities although many of the people that work in them do,” says Mark Payton, the chief executive. A former Oxford university academic, he has 20 years’ experience of spinouts and has made more than 30 venture investments.

    Investors seem to believe the story. In just two weeks, Mercia last year managed to raise £70m before expenses through a placing and flotation. The fund run by veteran fund manager Neil Woodford, holds 20.2 per cent of the stock, while Invesco has taken a 29.5 per cent stake in it.

    Mercia operates a dual strategy. It runs Mercia Fund Management, which invests in early stage companies along with private individuals using tax-friendly means such as the Seed Enterprise Investment Scheme. The £22m fund has a portfolio of 44 companies — about 15 of which are break-even or profitable. One is paying a dividend.

    MFM will normally make an initial investment of between £50,000 and £250,000. When one of these reaches the right stage, Mercia Investments takes a direct stake in MFM companies, leading them to an eventual sale or flotation.

    Mercia then offers existing investors and the founders the chance to sell part of their stake at a discount, allowing them to “clear the mortgage” while retaining an interest in growing the business, said Mr Payton.

    MFM sees about 400 business plans annually. In the first quarter it invested in 12. Mercia has invested roughly £13m in later-stage businesses since listing, which have attracted a further £57m from elsewhere.

    “We have already worked with the management team and know the business,” says Mr Payton. There should be no surprise nasties under the hood.

    It holds pre-emption rights to maintain its position in companies on future issues of equity. If others do not take up their rights, Mercia Investments also has first option to make further investment through its third party holdings, because it might take them over the tax relief threshold.

    First established in 2011, MFM’s first fund has so far returned 15 per cent. Including tax relief that rises to 60 per cent.

    “There is plenty of impatient capital. But there is a shortage of patient capital,” Mr Payton says. We have a 15-year cycle. We are trying to build a valuable asset with our own investment capital.”

    Investments include nDreams, which makes software for virtual reality headsets, and Soccer Manager, a computer game business in Preston that operates across most gaming platforms.

    It has spent £5.7m on its 45 per cent stake in Science Warehouse. In April it paid £3.5m for a further 18 per cent, valuing the business at more than £19m. Science Warehouse, a Leeds University spinout, has been profitable since 2009 and increased its revenues 89 per cent in the last three years.

    For Mercia, there are lucrative fees as well as performance incentive. Future trade sales and flotations of the companies it invests in will generate even more.

    Mr Payton hopes there will soon be more of such listed investment funds to replace venture capital funds — many of which have struggled to raise money and which work to a compressed time cycle: investing in the first two years and selling out after five.

    But he also admits that Mercia is a “Marmite” stock as dividends may be some way off. “Some people get the capital growth model,” he says. Many fund managers would rather not invest in other fund managers, even if they have access to early-stage companies not normally on the market, says Marcus Tregoning, analyst at Cenkos, Mercia’s broker. That can reduce demand and depress the share price.

    The market remains open minded. The stock is hovering just above its 50p listing price. House broker Cenkos estimates its net asset value (NAV) at £75m. With a market capitalisation of about £113m, that gives it a price/NAV of 1.5. The sector has historically traded on roughly three times NAV.

    While the risk may be hedged, it is still a volatile business. Imperial Innovations and IP Group hit as high as four times NAV in the mid-2000s but IPG was worth just half its NAV after the 2008 financial crisis. It is now back to two times NAV.

    It is little coincidence, then, to see that Mercia’s largest are the sort that invest for the long haul.