Currencies

Asia markets tentative ahead of Opec meeting

Wednesday 2.30am GMT Overview Markets across Asia were treading cautiously on Wednesday, following mild overnight gains for Wall Street, a weakening of the US dollar and as investors turned their attention to a meeting between Opec members later today. What to watch Oil prices are in focus ahead of Wednesday’s Opec meeting in Vienna. The […]

Continue Reading

Banks, Financial

RBS emerges as biggest failure in tough UK bank stress tests

Royal Bank of Scotland has emerged as the biggest failure in the UK’s annual stress tests, forcing the state-controlled lender to present regulators with a new plan to bolster its capital position by at least £2bn. Barclays and Standard Chartered also failed to meet some of their minimum hurdles in the toughest stress scenario ever […]

Continue Reading

Banks

Barclays: life in the old dog yet

Barclays, a former basket case of British banking, is beginning to look inspiringly mediocre. The bank has failed Bank of England stress tests less resoundingly than Royal Bank of Scotland. Investors believe its assets are worth only 10 per cent less than their book value, judging from the share price. Although Barclays’s legal team have […]

Continue Reading

Currencies, Equities

Scary movie sequel beckons for eurozone markets

Just as horror movies can spook fright nerds more than they expect, so political risk is sparking heightened levels of anxiety among seasoned investors. Investors caught out by Brexit and Donald Trump are making better preparations for political risk in Europe, plotting a route to the exit door if the unfolding story of French, German […]

Continue Reading

Currencies

Dollar rises as markets turn eyes to Opec

European bourses are mirroring a tentative Asia session as the dollar continues to be supported by better US economic data and investors turn their attention to a meeting between Opec members. Sentiment is underpinned by US index futures suggesting the S&P 500 will gain 3 points to 2,207.3 when trading gets under way later in […]

Continue Reading

Categorized | Banks, Financial

Healthy liquidity needed to survive shocks


Posted on April 30, 2015

A Wall Street sign adjacent to the New York Stock Exchange, Thursday, Oct. 2, 2014. European stock markets opened with slight gains Thursday Dec. 11, 2014 after a nosedive in Asia as falling oil prices reinforced jitters about a sluggish global economy. (AP Photo/Richard Drew)©AP

What are the big risks to the stability of western financial markets today? This week I posed that question to powerful finance industry professionals at the Milken Institute global conference in Los Angeles.

Grexit was mentioned. So was a slowdown in China, Middle East instability and the looming US interest rate rise (although, when asked when the Federal Reserve would start raising rates, more than half of the audience thought it would not happen until 2016).

    But there was another, more esoteric concern on almost everybody’s lips: liquidity mismatches deep in the bond markets. Seven long years after the 2008 crisis, reforms to the financial system have produced some success, in the sense that regulated banks have reduced their risks. But they have not just moved out of some of the crazier arenas, such as ultra-complex derivatives, in which they operated before 2008; they have left more mainstream areas, too. The inventories of US corporate bonds held by broker-dealer banks have plunged
    from $300bn in 2008 to $50bn, according to research from CQS.

    This is a classic unintended consequence. It has reduced the ability of banks to act as market makers, standing ready to buy or sell when investors want to trade, leaving it harder for others to do so. So while the stock of outstanding US high-grade corporate bond has risen since 2008, from $2,800bn to $5,000bn, the level of market turnover has tumbled to “at or close to the lowest levels on record”, Barclays says.

    What makes this pattern particularly pernicious — and worrying to those Milken guests — is that while banks have cut their inventories of bonds, asset managers have recently been gobbling them up on a formidable scale in a search for yields. It is estimated that in the past year more than 70 per cent of corporate credit was purchased by investors such as mutual funds, a dramatically higher figure than before.

    In theory, this could deliver benefits for the wider financial system; after all, if non-bank actors buy corporate credit, that diversifies risks. But the catch is that many asset managers rely on potentially flighty forms of funding. Mutual funds, for example, typically have to return investor funds on demand (in the jargon they operate with “daily liquidity”). And that creates liquidity mismatch: if US rates suddenly rise, retail investors might flood out of bond funds — since they fear the move will trigger sharp bond price falls — forcing those funds to sell. If that happens, those funds might discover the bonds are completely illiquid, or untradeable except at rock bottom prices, like those subprime assets back in 2008).

    Is there any way to mitigate this risk? Regulators show little willingness to roll back regulatory reforms. Nor are they keen to use public money to keep markets moving (although some central bank governors privately admit that, if a really big crisis were to hit, central banks could eventually be forced to make markets themselves).

    The key is to watch what the rest of the private sector might, or might not, do as banks retreat. There are plenty of actors still flush with liquidity: as Josh Harris, co-founder of Apollo Global Management, points out, private equity funds have big untapped resources and might buy bonds if the prices fell.

    There are also signs that entrepreneurs are moving in to fill the void. “Creative destruction as banks are forced to evolve opens up enormous opportunity [for others],” argues Bill Blain of Mint Partners, a small London broker. Most notably, new trading platforms are springing up to provide alternatives to the banks, including one run by Mint.

    Meanwhile, some banks are turning entrepreneurial. Last month State Street unveiled a service to enable its asset manager clients to assess their vulnerabilities and liquidity needs and help them withstand any future shock. The custodian bank knows asset managers face growing pressure from regulators to strengthen their buffers — and wants to jump into a new business niche.

    Although these entrepreneurial responses are encouraging, it is unclear whether they will be enough to avoid future jolts, given the sheer scale of the structural mismatches.

    Thankfully, nobody expects the test to come quite yet. And if a Fed rate rise is delayed until 2016 asset managers will have more time to prepare — and more entrepreneurs will jump in. Or so the hope goes. But, if nothing else, the pattern is a potent reminder that the problem of liquidity and maturity mismatches did not disappear with the 2008 crisis. Nor did the potential for some investors to keep ignoring them until it is too late

    gillian.tett@ft.com