BoE stress tests: all you need to know

The Bank of England has released the results of its latest round of its annual banking stress tests and its semi-annual financial stability report this morning. Used to measure the resilience of a bank’s balance sheet in adverse scenarios, the stress tests measured the impact of a severe slowdown in Chinese growth, a global recession […]

Continue Reading


Draghi: Eurozone will decline without vital productivity growth

It’s productivity, stupid. European Central Bank president Mario Draghi has become the latest major policymaker to warn of the long-term economic damage posed by chronically low productivity growth, as he urged eurozone governments to take action to lift growth and stoke innovation. Speaking in Madrid on Wednesday, Mr Draghi noted that productivity rises in the […]

Continue Reading


Asia markets tentative ahead of Opec meeting

Wednesday 2.30am GMT Overview Markets across Asia were treading cautiously on Wednesday, following mild overnight gains for Wall Street, a weakening of the US dollar and as investors turned their attention to a meeting between Opec members later today. What to watch Oil prices are in focus ahead of Wednesday’s Opec meeting in Vienna. The […]

Continue Reading

Banks, Financial

RBS emerges as biggest failure in tough UK bank stress tests

Royal Bank of Scotland has emerged as the biggest failure in the UK’s annual stress tests, forcing the state-controlled lender to present regulators with a new plan to bolster its capital position by at least £2bn. Barclays and Standard Chartered also failed to meet some of their minimum hurdles in the toughest stress scenario ever […]

Continue Reading


Barclays: life in the old dog yet

Barclays, a former basket case of British banking, is beginning to look inspiringly mediocre. The bank has failed Bank of England stress tests less resoundingly than Royal Bank of Scotland. Investors believe its assets are worth only 10 per cent less than their book value, judging from the share price. Although Barclays’s legal team have […]

Continue Reading

Categorized | Property

Labour to take on private landlords

Posted on April 30, 2014


Ed Miliband, Labour leader

Private landlords are the latest “vested interest” to be targeted by the Labour party, with Ed Miliband set to promise longer tenancies, more stable rents and an end to up-front lettings fees.

The Labour leader, launching his party’s election campaign for local and European elections, will promise to tackle what he calls “the terrible insecurity of Britain’s private rental market”.

The move is the latest element of the opposition’s campaign on the “cost of living”, which has seen salvos against banks, energy companies, betting companies, pension providers, housebuilders and transport firms. But critics warn the move could undermine attempts to create a more professional private rented sector.

    Mr Miliband will say: “The next Labour government will legislate to make three-year tenancies the standard in the British private rented sector.”

    “Tenants can’t be surprised by rents that go through the roof.”

    The announcement comes amid a historic shift in Britain away from home ownership and social housing towards private rented property with 4m households now living in the sector.

    The trend has been driven by rising house prices and the sell-off of council houses since the 1980s under Margaret Thatcher’s Right to Buy scheme – as well as an influx of buy-to-let investors.

    “Generation rent is a generation that has been ignored for too long,” Mr Miliband will say. “Nine million people are living in rented homes today . . . a Labour government will take action to deliver a fairer deal for them too.”

    Labour will promise to end the typical £350 fee which people pay agents to secure a tenancy.

    It will also enforce new three-year contracts which landlords would not be able to break simply for the sake of getting a higher rent. Instead they would only be able to end the contract – with two months’ notice – if they had a good reason such as rent arrears, antisocial behaviour or breaches of the agreement.

    Party officials said the policy did not amount to a crude Venezuela-style rent cap.

    Landlords and tenants would have to set initial rents based on market value, with a rent review no more frequently than once a year.

    At that point landlords would be prevented from raising rents any higher than an “upper ceiling” set in place by legislation. That cap would be based on a benchmark such as average market rents.

    But Marnix Elsenaar, head of planning, at law firm Addleshaw Goddard, said the move could make undermine attempts to attract institutional investors into the incipient “build-to-let sector”.

    “Much of the attraction for investors is a lack of restrictions around planning use or rent levels,” he said. “Rent caps would severely undermine the potential to get the investment we desperately need in the sector.”

    An increasing number of professional property developers are moving into the lettings business. The former Olympic Village in Stratford, east London, has been converted into rented housing run by Get Living London, which offers longer-term tenancies and inflation-based rents.

    Delancey plans to develop a tower full of rented flats at Elephant and Castle in south London.

    Meanwhile, start-up Essential Living has vowed to shake up the capital’s lettings market, dominated by small amateur landlords. Martin Bellinger, its chief operating officer, said landlords needed to offer the “flexibility” of both short and long-term leases.

    “At a time when everyone is falling over themselves to support a professionalised rental sector, proposing rent caps would be absolute madness. It will kill off institutional investment in one fell swoop,” he said.

    Ian Potter, chief executive of letting agents’ membership body Arla, said the typical high street agent was not charging excessive amounts. Any tenancy of more than three years would need a legal deed to be signed in the presence of a solicitor, involving complicated and expensive legal fees, Mr Potter said.