Nomura rounds up markets’ biggest misses in 2016

Forecasting markets a year in advance is never easy, but with “year-ahead investment themes” season well underway, Nomura has provided a handy reminder of quite how difficult it is, with an overview of markets’ biggest hits and misses (OK, mostly misses) from the start of 2016. The biggest miss among analysts, according to Nomura’s Sam […]

Continue Reading


Spanish construction rebuilds after market collapse

Property developer Olivier Crambade founded Therus Invest in Madrid in 2004 to build offices and retail space. For five years business went quite well, and Therus developed and sold more than €300m of properties. Then Spain’s economy imploded, taking property with it, and Mr Crambade spent six years tending to Dhamma Energy, a solar energy […]

Continue Reading


Euro suffers worst month against the pound since financial crisis

Political risks are still all the rage in the currency markets. The euro has suffered its worst slump against the pound since 2009 in November, as investors hone in on a series of looming battles between eurosceptic populists and establishment parties at the ballot box. The single currency has shed 4.5 per cent against sterling […]

Continue Reading


RBS falls 2% after failing BoE stress test

Royal Bank of Scotland shares have slipped 2 per cent in early trading this morning, after the state-controlled lender emerged as the biggest loser in the Bank of England’s latest round of annual stress tests. The lender has now given regulators a plan to bulk up its capital levels by cutting costs and selling assets, […]

Continue Reading


China capital curbs reflect buyer’s remorse over market reforms

Last year the reformist head of China’s central bank convinced his Communist party bosses to give market forces a bigger say in setting the renminbi’s daily “reference rate” against the US dollar. In return, Zhou Xiaochuan assured his more conservative party colleagues that the redback would finally secure coveted recognition as an official reserve currency […]

Continue Reading

Categorized | Financial

Banks hit by debit card cap fee ruling

Posted on July 31, 2013

The Federal Reserve was criticised on Wednesday for being too soft on the financial industry after a judge ruled that limits on debit card fees charged to retailers were not tough enough.

Richard Leon, a district judge, found that a cap on “interchange fees” paid by retailers on debit card transactions had been set too high and should be lowered, in a decision that the American Bankers Association warned would have “disastrous consequences” for the banks.

    Visa shares fell more than 10 per cent immediately after the ruling.

    US Congress introduced the limit in 2010 and told the Fed to set the cap at an appropriate level. The original provision was fiercely opposed by the banks, which have since suffered a multibillion-dollar hit to revenues.

    But retailers said the cap had been set too high and Judge Leon agreed on Wednesday. He said the Fed had taken account of too many costs when setting the cap, including that of dealing with fraud, and it should be lowered.

    Dick Durbin, the Democratic senator who sponsored the cap, celebrated the court’s decision. He attacked the Fed for being too soft in its original “decision to bend to the lobbying by the big banks and card giants”.

    A spokesperson for the Fed said it was “reviewing the judge’s opinion”.

    The ABA said it was “deeply disappointed” and attacked the “price controls” as “further lining the pockets of our nation’s big-box retailers at their own customers’ expense”. The ABA said the Fed should deploy “all legal means” to fight the decision.

    MasterCard, which is less reliant than Visa on debit cards and which reported improved results on Wednesday, fell more than 4 per cent following the ruling, but closed up 1.5 per cent in New York. Visa closed down 7.5 per cent.

    The Fed had argued that it was free to consider costs not specifically banned by the law.

    “Not quite!” wrote the judge at the district court in Washington. “If I were to accept the Board’s argument, then every term in the statute would have to be specifically defined or otherwise be deemed ambiguous. This result makes no sense, and more importantly, it is not the law.”

    He found the Fed’s interpretation of the law “utterly indefensible” and said it had “shoehorned a whole array of excluded costs into the interchange fee standard”.

    The case was brought by a collection of retailers and trade associations, including NACS, the convenience store lobby group, and the National Retail Federation.

    Banks have considered introducing fees to consumers to make up for the revenue shortfall but both Bank of America and Wells Fargo have dropped the idea amid fears of a consumer backlash.

    Alan Greenspan, the former Fed chairman, has criticised the limit as an undue interference in free markets.

    The court ruling comes as the European Commission takes aim at fees with its own caps. MasterCard has argued that the “coerced reduction of interchange fees” in various countries has backfired, with cards becoming more expensive while retail prices barely change. In Australia, “the merchant pocketed the reduction”, it argued to the commission.

    The payments network reported a 19 per cent year-on-year increase in second-quarter net income to $848m on Wednesday on revenue that rose 15.2 per cent to $2.1bn.