Hard-hit online lender CAN Capital makes executive changes

The biggest online lender to small businesses in the US has pulled down the shutters and put its top managers on a leave of absence, in the latest blow to an industry grappling with mounting fears over credit quality. Atlanta-based CAN Capital said on Tuesday that it had replaced a trio of senior executives, after […]

Continue Reading


BoE stress tests: all you need to know

The Bank of England has released the results of its latest round of its annual banking stress tests and its semi-annual financial stability report this morning. Used to measure the resilience of a bank’s balance sheet in adverse scenarios, the stress tests measured the impact of a severe slowdown in Chinese growth, a global recession […]

Continue Reading


Zoopla wins back customers from online property rival

Zoopla chief executive Alex Chesterman has branded rival OnTheMarket “a failed experiment”, and said that his property site was winning back customers at a record rate. OnTheMarket was set up last year, aiming to compete with Zoopla and Rightmove, the UK’s two biggest property portals. It allowed estate agents to list their properties more cheaply […]

Continue Reading


Asia markets tentative ahead of Opec meeting

Wednesday 2.30am GMT Overview Markets across Asia were treading cautiously on Wednesday, following mild overnight gains for Wall Street, a weakening of the US dollar and as investors turned their attention to a meeting between Opec members later today. What to watch Oil prices are in focus ahead of Wednesday’s Opec meeting in Vienna. The […]

Continue Reading

Banks, Financial

RBS emerges as biggest failure in tough UK bank stress tests

Royal Bank of Scotland has emerged as the biggest failure in the UK’s annual stress tests, forcing the state-controlled lender to present regulators with a new plan to bolster its capital position by at least £2bn. Barclays and Standard Chartered also failed to meet some of their minimum hurdles in the toughest stress scenario ever […]

Continue Reading

Categorized | Banks

Swiss tax proposal jolts bank employees

Posted on May 31, 2013

For the banks caught up in Switzerland’s bitter tax dispute with the US, the Swiss government’s plan to create a legal basis for settlements with US authorities offers the welcome prospect of closure.

For bank employees, the plan is rather less appealing – because the business records that Swiss banks can now disclose include the names of staff who were involved in dealing with US clients.

    Even among staff who did not follow the example of Bradley Birkenfeld – a former Geneva-based UBS private banker, who famously hid diamonds in tubes of toothpaste to help clients move assets without detection – this is an unwelcome prospect.

    “Of course bankers are worried,” said Denise Chervet, director of the Swiss Association of Bank Employees. “They don’t know what is going to happen, and it is never a nice feeling when you don’t know what someone is going to do with your data.”

    Some of the 13 banks that the US has been investigating for at least two years, such as Credit Suisse and Julius Baer, received permission from the Swiss government to transmit business records last year, and have already begun doing so.

    As a result, the banks and staff most affected by the new proposal – which still has to be approved by Switzerland’s parliament – are likely to be those that have not yet entered negotiations with the US authorities. Third parties, such as lawyers, who had dealings with US customers, may also be affected.

    The Swiss government’s proposed bill contains several provisions on the actions banks must take to protect bankers whose names end up in the hands of US authorities.

    These range from informing bankers in advance if their details will be transferred and assuming legal costs incurred by named employees, to pledging not to ask prospective employees about whether they have been caught up in the transmission of data to the US.

    In addition, a SFr2.5m hardship fund will be set up to cover employees who find themselves in a “personally, financially or economically difficult situation” as a result of banks’ co-operation with US authorities.

    However, banks are less well-placed to prevent the thing that their employees fear most – namely, that the US will pursue charges against some of the staff whose details come into their possession.

    The US is in possession of the names of more than 1,000 bank employees as a result of information provided by banking clients, according to Ms Chervet.

    “A lot more names will be provided, but it is hard to say how many of those people will be charged with anything. If the banks settle with the US, it will have less incentive to go after individual bankers,” she said.