Currencies

Nomura rounds up markets’ biggest misses in 2016

Forecasting markets a year in advance is never easy, but with “year-ahead investment themes” season well underway, Nomura has provided a handy reminder of quite how difficult it is, with an overview of markets’ biggest hits and misses (OK, mostly misses) from the start of 2016. The biggest miss among analysts, according to Nomura’s Sam […]

Continue Reading

Property

Spanish construction rebuilds after market collapse

Property developer Olivier Crambade founded Therus Invest in Madrid in 2004 to build offices and retail space. For five years business went quite well, and Therus developed and sold more than €300m of properties. Then Spain’s economy imploded, taking property with it, and Mr Crambade spent six years tending to Dhamma Energy, a solar energy […]

Continue Reading

Currencies

Euro suffers worst month against the pound since financial crisis

Political risks are still all the rage in the currency markets. The euro has suffered its worst slump against the pound since 2009 in November, as investors hone in on a series of looming battles between eurosceptic populists and establishment parties at the ballot box. The single currency has shed 4.5 per cent against sterling […]

Continue Reading

Banks

RBS falls 2% after failing BoE stress test

Royal Bank of Scotland shares have slipped 2 per cent in early trading this morning, after the state-controlled lender emerged as the biggest loser in the Bank of England’s latest round of annual stress tests. The lender has now given regulators a plan to bulk up its capital levels by cutting costs and selling assets, […]

Continue Reading

Currencies

China capital curbs reflect buyer’s remorse over market reforms

Last year the reformist head of China’s central bank convinced his Communist party bosses to give market forces a bigger say in setting the renminbi’s daily “reference rate” against the US dollar. In return, Zhou Xiaochuan assured his more conservative party colleagues that the redback would finally secure coveted recognition as an official reserve currency […]

Continue Reading

Categorized | Banks, Insurance

Underwriters eye banks’ Libor exposure


Posted on July 31, 2012

Underwriters who cover bank executives and provide professional indemnity insurance are watching nervously as class action suits and legal demands mount against big banks caught in the Libor scandal.

Libor claims could be “a bigger game changer” for such insurers than the fallout from the financial crisis of 2008, according to one of the world’s biggest insurance brokers.

    “This impacts so many people,” says Richard Magrann-Wells, financial services leader at the broker Willis. “Trillions of dollars [worth of financial instrument] could be impacted.”

    If a class action suit goes the wrong way, “that’s the big scary thing”, says a financial services underwriter, pointing to a possible legal precedent in the US, the world’s litigation hotspot.

    Lawsuits by banks, funds and municipalities have been filed over the past year as regulators and prosecutors stepped up efforts to uncover alleged manipulation of the London Interbank Offered Rate, or Libor, and its Brussels and Tokyo equivalents, Euribor and Tibor.

    Banks’ potential exposure to those and future class actions have been estimated by analysts to be as high as $35bn. Plaintiff law firms have set the costs higher, with estimates of potential payouts reaching $1tn.

    “The fear is that Libor will become a litigation-fest for four years or more,” says Saul Haydon Rowe, a partner at structured credit specialist Devon Capital.

    While Libor was hitherto a technical financial term, it has become ingrained in the popular consciousness since Barclays paid £290m to settle with US and UK regulators last month.

    Since then, Barclays shares have fallen by as much as 16 per cent, wiping £3.4bn off its market value.

    The plummeting share price prompted some US investors earlier this month to sue the bank – adding to the legal problems facing the UK bank. Other plaintiffs who have filed class actions against the Libor panel banks include the City of Baltimore, the broker Charles Schwab and buyers of interest-rate derivatives.

    What differentiates the Barclays investors’ claim from others is that they are not maintaining that Libor fluctuations had a direct effect on purchases; rather they argue that they were harmed because Barclays lied about being a “model corporate citizen” and they blame it for causing the drop in the share price
    .

    Regulatory settlements do not shelter defendants from class-action payouts.

    Any findings by regulators of collusion – and settlements tend to be reached by defendants making admissions, or not contesting facts – could be particularly troublesome for the banks because antitrust cases in the US can potentially award treble damages; this can be limited to actual damages for those who won leniency through co-operation with authorities.

    The UK does not have a class-action system and awards tend to be far lower in comparison with the US. Commercial-court judges in London will also be wary of handing down a decision that could “open the flood gates” and risk unravelling worldwide contracts based on Libor, according to Simon Hart, a litigator at Reynolds Porter Chamberlain.

    However, existing lawsuits filed in London against Barclays and other banks over alleged mis-selling of interest-rate swaps are now studying whether Libor-rigging accusations can be included in their complaint, says Susannah Sheppard, a lawyer at Sheppard & Smith.

    Ms Sheppard is examining potential collusion arguments for Guardian Care Homes, which is already suing Barclays for £12m over how it was sold interest-rate swaps.

    As banks enter reporting season, there will be much scrutiny over their stated planning around the Libor probe, because under US accounting guidelines, banks and other companies are required to disclose potential litigation risks and estimate their costs.

    In the case of Barclays, which published its financial results on Friday, it disclosed for the first time that it had set aside £450m for potential claims from allegations of mis-selling of interest-rate swaps.

    Insurers are unlikely to wait to see what the courts do. With policies renewed annually, a hesitancy in the market is palpable, brokers warned.

    “You’re not going to see a large number of new carriers wanting to jump in when there’s been major, major losses,” says Mr Magrann-Wells of Willis.

    Reporting by Lina Saigol, Caroline Binham and Alistair Gray